Review of California Conservation Lands

  • Intro
  • Filter
  • Projects
  • Ecoregion
  • Data Resources
California Strategic Growth Council

Review of California Conservation Lands

Welcome to the California Strategic Growth Council's Review of California Conservation Lands. This application allows you to explore some of the conservation projects that took place within California.

The tabs above offer tools and connections to other resources. Clicking on the Filter tab allows you to filter down the projects based on their properties, or on whether they fall within a certain Ecoregion.

Filtering the data by Ecoregion creates an Ecoregion tab. This tab displays data specific to the Ecoregion, including its conservation estate and land ownership breakdown.

Clicking on the Projects tab shows you a list of all the currently visible projects, as well as a breakdown of the projects by type. Hovering over the list and clicking on the entries allow you to drill down on a specific project.

The Data Resources tab provides links to data used within this map, as well as links to related data that you may be interested in. The data is provided within Data Basin, where you can more deeply investigate the data, or add it to your own maps.

Ecoregion

[clear filter]

Project Types?

This chart shows the distribution of visible projects by type. It is based on number of projects, not on area coverage.

[close]

Ecoregion Breakdown

The data in this section is specific to the ecoregion, and is independent of specific projects. The pie charts show the percentage of area covered within the ecoregion.

GAP Status?

Owner?

Transparency of Pie Chart Data:
Fully
Opaque
Fully
Transparent
Data on this tab derived from PAD-US (CBI Edition) Version 2.1, California.
The links below will take you to Data Basin datasets and galleries representing data used within, or related to, this map.

Summary Datasets

  • Regional Conservation Plans, California
  • Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), California
  • Conservation Plans Including Target Listed Species in California
  • Conservation Plans Including Threats from Drought in California
  • See more...

Related Content

  • CMIP5 General Circulation Models (GCMs) for California
  • Conservation Estate
  • California Land Use / Land Cover
  • California Biological Data
  • Funded by the California Strategic Growth Council
  • Created by the Conservation Biology Institute

Targets

Some projects had specific biological species or ecosystem targets. Projects could have one or more targets.

  • Legally Protected Species: At least one target of this project was a species that is legally protected under federal or state endangered species law.
  • Other Species: At least one target of this project was a species that is not legally protected but of interest in the plan.
  • Legally Protected Ecosystems: At least one target of this project was an ecosystem that is legally protected under federal or state law.
  • Other Ecosystems: At least one target of this project was an ecosystem that is not legally protected but of interest in the plan.
✖

Conservation Goals

Some projects have specific conservation goals.

  • Not Specified: The conservation goal for this project was not specified.
  • General: The stated conservation goal for this project was general in nature, lacking specific measurable outcomes.
  • Spatially Explicit: The conservation goal for this project was specific often with measurable outcomes that often had spatially explicit aspects.
✖

Ecosystem Services

Some projects were focused around certain ecosystem services. A single project can be associated with multiple ecosystem services.

  • Water: Those projects that specified water as a provisioning service for domestic use, irrigation, power generation, or transportation.
  • Carbon: Those projects that examined carbon storage or carbon sequestration as a conservation/social benefit.
  • Prime Agriculture: Those projects that considered agriculture from the standpoint of nutrient cycling, primary production, soil formation, and/or food supply.
✖

Opportunities and Analyses

Some projects focused on specific types of analyses or considered potential opportunities to advance conservation.

  • Connectivity: Projects that considered some aspect of landscape linkage (or corridor) mapping for natural habitats or species.
  • Gap Analysis: Projects that conducted some form of gap analysis to identify gaps in conservation lands representation of specific natural community types or species.
  • Intactness: Projects that considered the ecological condition of the landscape; mapping of naturalness or ecological integrity in some way.
  • Ownership: Projects that considered ownership viewed here as opportunities for future land designation for conservation.
  • Recreation: Projects that considered the possibility for land to support recreational activities including hiking trails, photography, hunting, and environmental education.
✖

Threats

Some projects were focused around certain threats to the environment. A single project can have multiple threats associated with it.

  • Climate Change: Projects that considered potential climate change impacts due to gradual changes in temperature and precipitation and changes in extreme events.
  • Development: Projects that considered development (urban, energy, and/or agriculture) as a threat.
  • Drought: Projects that considered drought as a threat to native species, natural communities, and ecological processes.
  • Invasives: Projects that considered invasives species as a threat to native species, natural communities, and ecological processes.
  • Fire: Projects that considered wildfire to native species, natural communities, and ecological processes.
✖

Project Type

Many projects fell under a certain type.

  • AHCP/CCAA: Aquatic Habitat Conservation Plan / Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances (CCAAs). CCAAs expand on the success of traditional CCAs by providing non-federal landowners with additional incentives for engaging in voluntary proactive conservation through assurances that limit future conservation obligations. One of the primary reasons for developing the CCAA program was to address landowner concerns about the potential regulatory implications of having a listed species on their land. The CCAA program specifically targets non-federal landowners and provides them with the assurance that if they implement various conservation activities, they will not be subject to additional restrictions if the species becomes listed under the ESA. These assurances are only available to non-federal entities for actions on non-federal lands.
  • CCP: Comprehensive Conservation Plan. A CCP is a document that provides a framework for guiding refuge management decisions.
  • Greenprint: A Greenprint informs businesses and residents about the benefits of creating a sustainable community and promotes environmentally friendly living.
  • HCP: A Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) is a required part of an application for an Incidental Take Permit, a permit issued under the United States Endangered Species Act (ESA) to private entities undertaking projects that might result in the destruction of an endangered or threatened species. It is a planning document that ensures that the anticipated take of a listed species will be minimized or mitigated by conserving the habitat upon which the species depend, thereby contributing to the recovery of the species as a whole.
  • LMP: Land Management Plan. Land Management Plans are written to document management goals and objectives for Ecological Reserves and Wildlife Areas.
  • MSHCP: Mutliple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. A comprehensive plan developed to replace multiple ‘take’ permits. Similar to an HCP, but involving multiple species.
  • NCCP/HCP: Natural Community Conservation Plan / Habitat Conservation Plan. An NCCP identifies and provides for the regional protection of plants, animals, and their habitats, while allowing compatible and appropriate economic activity. Working with landowners, environmental organizations, and other interested parties, a local agency oversees the numerous activities that compose the development of an NCCP. CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provide the necessary support, direction, and guidance to NCCP participants.
  • NGO: Non Govermental Organization initiated plan
  • Other: A plan that does not fall into any of the other categories.
  • REA: Rapid Ecological Assessment. REAs examine ecological values, conditions, and trends within ecoregions, which are large, connected areas that have similar environmental characteristics. REAs are called “rapid” assessments because they synthesize existing information, rather than conduct research or collect new data, and are generally completed within 18 months.
  • UNIV: University initiated plan.
✖

GAP Status

From the IUCN Definitions

  • GAP Status 1: An area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a natural state within which disturbance events (of natural type, frequency, intensity, and legacy) are allowed to proceed without interference or are mimicked through management.
  • GAP Status 2: An area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a primarily natural state, but which may receive uses or management practices that degrade the quality of existing natural communities, including suppression of natural disturbance.
  • GAP Status 3: Area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover for the majority of area. Subject to extractive uses of either broad, low-intensity type (eg. Logging) or localized intense type (eg. Mining). Confers protection to federally listed endangered and threatened species throughout the area.
  • GAP Status 4: No known public/private institutional mandates/legally recognized easements. Includes private lands.
✖

Owner

  • CA Commission: California State Lands Commission (http://www.slc.ca.gov/).
  • CA Dept of Fish and Wildlife: California Department of Fish and Wildlife (https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/)
  • CA Forestry & Fire: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (http://www.fire.ca.gov/)
  • CA Parks & Rec: California Department of Parks and Recreation (http://www.parks.ca.gov/)
  • BLM: US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en.html)
  • DOD: United States Department of Defense (http://www.defense.gov/)
  • US Fish and Wildlife: US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/)
  • Forest Service: US Forest Service (http://www.fs.fed.us/)
  • National Parks: National Park Service (http://www.nps.gov/index.htm)
  • Other: Owner other than those listed above. Includes private lands.
✖